<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/</link>
	<description>Affiliate Powered E-Commerce, Worldwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:04:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beau Blackwell, Marketing Coordinator</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau Blackwell, Marketing Coordinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Tonda,

The Microsoft/Yahoo merger doesn&#039;t actually relate to Web 2.0. Web 2.0 is more of an idea about how to use the web, how to design websites, and more. If you&#039;re looking for more information on the topic, which can be pretty confusing, check out this description on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0 

I hope that helps a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonda,</p>
<p>The Microsoft/Yahoo merger doesn&#8217;t actually relate to Web 2.0. Web 2.0 is more of an idea about how to use the web, how to design websites, and more. If you&#8217;re looking for more information on the topic, which can be pretty confusing, check out this description on Wikipedia:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0</a> </p>
<p>I hope that helps a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonda</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>tonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-451</guid>
		<description>will this new merger be called web 2.0? If no do you know anything about this web 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will this new merger be called web 2.0? If no do you know anything about this web 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-420</guid>
		<description>I think that it might be a good thing. Because at first there might be a sort of battle between Microsoft and Google. 

Microsoft will try and steal Google&#039;s adword customer by undercutting the cpc which is a good thing for us.

At the end of the day I don&#039;t think people would use Microsoft as much as Google. Most people I talk to don&#039;t like Microsoft and Bill Gates for some reason :)

Anyhow we can all probably look forward to the future and the main search engine being MicGoogle.

Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it might be a good thing. Because at first there might be a sort of battle between Microsoft and Google. </p>
<p>Microsoft will try and steal Google&#8217;s adword customer by undercutting the cpc which is a good thing for us.</p>
<p>At the end of the day I don&#8217;t think people would use Microsoft as much as Google. Most people I talk to don&#8217;t like Microsoft and Bill Gates for some reason <img src='http://www.clickbank.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyhow we can all probably look forward to the future and the main search engine being MicGoogle.</p>
<p>Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-405</guid>
		<description>hasn&#039;t microsoft been around a lot longer than google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hasn&#8217;t microsoft been around a lot longer than google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-404</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fairly new at this but I agree with them both. Even I knew Microsoft was a giant before ever touching a keyboard. But are their motives as dastardly as world domination? Call me blind but I don&#039;t see that. Maybe they worked and made things happen. The earth lets us live here. We live by the fruit of our labors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fairly new at this but I agree with them both. Even I knew Microsoft was a giant before ever touching a keyboard. But are their motives as dastardly as world domination? Call me blind but I don&#8217;t see that. Maybe they worked and made things happen. The earth lets us live here. We live by the fruit of our labors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarbel</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>sarbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-396</guid>
		<description>A merger between Microsoft and Yahoo would be very interesting! It would totally spin around the current game, and would open new doors for newcomer affiliates and publishers such as myself! I&#039;m all for it, and whether it&#039;s a Yahoo Microsoft or Google Yahoo deal, I can&#039;t wait to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A merger between Microsoft and Yahoo would be very interesting! It would totally spin around the current game, and would open new doors for newcomer affiliates and publishers such as myself! I&#8217;m all for it, and whether it&#8217;s a Yahoo Microsoft or Google Yahoo deal, I can&#8217;t wait to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: extra-paycheck</title>
		<link>http://www.clickbank.com/blog/2008/05/22/the-next-google/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>extra-paycheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 08:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickbank.com/blog/?p=33#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is trying their best to take over the world but they simply cannot do it. Their ideas are not innovative, conservative I would say.

They could buy Yahoo and every other search engine on the World Wide but they will never come close to what Google is. Google has been around for a little too long and is growing a little too fast for those folks at Microsoft.

Microsoft failed with PC&#039;s, portable music and many other things - their &quot;SUPER&quot; search engine project is just another big fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is trying their best to take over the world but they simply cannot do it. Their ideas are not innovative, conservative I would say.</p>
<p>They could buy Yahoo and every other search engine on the World Wide but they will never come close to what Google is. Google has been around for a little too long and is growing a little too fast for those folks at Microsoft.</p>
<p>Microsoft failed with PC&#8217;s, portable music and many other things &#8211; their &#8220;SUPER&#8221; search engine project is just another big fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
